英语论文网

/>     4.4 The Over-Represented Group.......... 106-109
    4.5 Mixed Group.......... 109-116
        4.5.1 The Pattern of It v-link ADJ to-inf..........109-113
        4.5.2 The Pattern of It v-link ADJ that..........113-116
    4.6 Summary ..........116-117
Chapter Five Evaluative Patterns of ADJ Patterns Followed..........117-152
    5.1 Introduction.......... 117
    5.2 The Pattern of ADJ1 to-inf ..........117-128
    5.3 The Pattern It v-link ADJ to-inf ..........128-136
    5.4 The Pattern It v-link ADJ for n to-inf.......... 136-143
5.5 The Pattern It v-link ADJ that ..........143-149

Conclusion

The present study has yielded a number of finding relating to similarities anddifferences in the use of adjective patterns across different proficiency levels, and tothe evaluative meanings of such patterns underlying the learners’ performance inargumentative production. Theoretically, some of the findings in this particular studyof L2 learners’ evaluation have developed the current theories of evaluation andreevaluated the Pattern Grammar, while others have contributed to the theory of erroranalysis from a lexico-grammar perspective. Practically, some discussions concerningthe multivariate analysis and the implementation of the Pattern Grammar approach aresignificant in language research and language teaching. The limitations of the presentstudy must be acknowledged such as scope and generalizability issues. In spite of allthese, the present study can serve as a starting point for future research on the L2learners’ evaluative language, either written or spoken.

References
1 Blasius, J. & M. Greenacre (1998). (Eds.) Visualization www.51lunwen.org/englishpaperguide/ of Categorical Data. London:Academic Press.
2Anderson, L. B. (1986) Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: typologicallyregular asymmetries. In Chafe, W. & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: theLinguistic Coding of Epistemology (pp. 273-312). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction toStatistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a NewspaperCorpus. London: Continuum.
5Belin, A. (2006). How do you Like it?: Likes and Dislikes in Native Speaker andAdvanced Learner Spoken English. Universite Catholique de Louvain:Unpublished MA dissertation
6Besnier, N. (1993). Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae Atoll. In J.H. Hill & J.T.Irvine (Eds.), Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse (pp. 161-181).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
8Biber, D. & E. Finegan (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. DiscourseProcesses, 11: 1-34.Biber, D. et al. (1998). Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & E. Finegan. (1999) LongmanGrammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
10Biber, D. (2006). University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Writtenregisters. Amsterdam: Benjamins本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。