英语论文网

the coastal state may undertake hot pursuit. However, in comparison to article 23 GCHS, article 111 (2) UNCLOS is more extensive and stipulates that the right applies mutatis mutandis to violations of legislation applicable to the exclusive economic zone or the continental shelf (including safety zones around continental shelf installations). [46] The right to begin hot pursuit while the foreign ship is within the contiguous zone is limited to the enforcement of certain rights, that is to say if there has been a violation of the rights for the protection of which the zone was established. [47] Robert C. Reuland mentions that “although a state’s legislative jurisdiction within the contiguous zone may not be limited to the four purposes set out in both sea conventions, such laws should nevertheless be limited to the protection of the state’s territory and territorial sea. It follows that hot pursuit may not be commenced from the contiguous zone for violations of laws that do not reasonably comport with the littoral state’s legislative competence with respect to this zone.” [48] . Whether pursuit may start while the ship is in the continental shelf or in the exclusive economic zone is more directly an aspect of the question whether the violation was made against legislation relation to these zones, than in the case of the contiguous zone. The offence is more directly related to the regime of the zone. [49] The state may enact laws consistent with the sovereign rights in these zones, for example relating to protection of fisheries etc in the case of the exclusive economic zone. Similarly, the violation of any law enacted by the coastal state that is consistent with the state’s sovereign rights over the continental shelf may give rise to the right of hot pursuit. [50]

The right of hot pursuit ceases as soon as the pursued ship enters the territorial waters of its own or a third state. [51] To continue therein would result in a violation of that state’s sovereignty and that is accordingly offending international law. [52] This general rule may however be put aside where hot pursuit in another state’s territorial sea is permitted by treaty. [53] It is important to mention that the general rule of cessation at the territorial sea of another state does not apply to other maritime zones beyond the territorial sea, so the pursuing state may actually pursue the foreign ship into the exclusive economic zone or even the contiguous zone of another state. Such zones are to be considered as high seas when it comes to hot pursuit. [54]

There are however different opinions of whether this general rule is applicable in cases where, for example, the pursuit of pirate vessels are continued within the territorial sea of another state if that state is not in a position to take up the pursuit itself. Without such an exception, the wrongdoers may flee to the territorial sea of any other state unwilling or unable to take up pursuit and in this way avoid punishment. This exception would be an expansion of the right of hot pursuit which obviously would increase the effectiveness of the coastal state’s law enforcement. However, the legal basis for such an exception is not beyond question. [55]

4.5. The character of hot pursuit; signal to stop, “hot and continuous” [56] and the use of force

4.5.1. Signal to stop

It is essential that before the hot pursuit may commence, the pursued vessel has b本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。