英语论文网

2008年秋,关于选拔测验的调查问卷被分发给同意参与这项调查的所有教师。问卷调查为了获得定性和定量的数据，由一个封闭的问题和一个开放的问题组成。最初，问题被分为三种：是——确实——不是，这些问题用17版SPSS定量分析。并不是所有的回复者都回答了所有问题，这时他们被编码为“零响应”。第二个问题包含了个人对第一个问题的延伸意见，从而提供了质量更高的信息。定性数据根据主题进行编码，然后用Windows XP的NVivo 8软件进行研究，以展现答案的范围以及不同回答者之间的差异和联系。为了保证匿名性，每个完成这项问卷的人都会得到一组识别码，这样数据就可以在学校，权威机构和教学点之间交叉引用。

The questionnaires were sent out with the screening test during the autumn of 2008 to all teachers who had agreed to participate in this study. Questions were designed to elicit both qualitative and quantitative data involving first, a closed question and second, an open question. Initial questions were rated on a scale of three: yes - quite - no and these were analysed quantitatively using the computer program SPSS Version 17. Not all respondents answered every question in the questionnaires and when this was the case they were coded as 'Nil response'. The second responses involved individual comments offered to extend the first answer lending greater quality of information. The qualitative data was coded according to theme and searched using NVivo 8 software for Windows XP to demonstrate the range of answers and differences/ communality between responses. To ensure anonymity, each person who had completed a questionnaire was given an identification number so that the data could be cross-referenced between schools, authorities and teaching position. These attributes were chosen to see if there was any consensus between schools within authorities as well as between authorities. It was also intended to find out what teachers holding different positions within the schools felt about phonological awareness and its role in literacy acquisition. The following code information was assigned to each respondent:

CT (+number) = Class teacher.

PT (+number) = Principal teacher.

SfL (+number) = Support for learning.

DHT (+number) = Depute head teacher.

HT (+number) = Head teacher.

H = Highland Council.

WI = Western Isles Council.

O = Other Council.

Thus PT20WI refers to a principal teacher from School 20 within Western Isles Council.

There was frequent opportunity for individual comments to be made in both questionnaire and interview. The questions which were investigated in the questionnaire can be seen in Appendix 8 which gives full details of the questionnaire responses. A total of 45 questionnaire responses were received from Gaelic-medium units and schools. Two schools returned the test results but did not return the questionnaire completed. No reason was given but three teachers who were interviewed said they had not been given the full package at first, only the test materials, and had been given the questionnaire and consent form by the Head Teacher at a later date. Three schools had photocopied the questionnaire and returned two questionnaires each completed by different teachers who had conducted the tests, one teaching Primary 2, the other teaching Primary 3.

问卷的返回与被测人在学校中的教学职位有关——Returns of questionnaires relating to teaching position in schools.

The questionnaire respondents held various roles in the schools as shown in Figure 11. As the screening test had been intended for use by classroom teachers, it was encouraging to find that 62.2% of respondents were indeed classroom teachers. In some of the 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。