英语论文网

cesses dictate that cultural systems are not based on random events but a degree of predictability. This predictability shapes the assumption regarding certain cultural characteristics. These assumptions are predicated on what might be false narratives of how specific cultural groups behavior and furthermore may dictate how individuals perceive these other cultural groups in terms of intelligence and maturity (Hofstede, 2001, p. 6). As “software of the mind”, it drives the cultural assumptions others have toward other cultural groups.

 

The model espoused by Hofstede lends itself quite nicely to the overall narrative described at the outset of this analysis. Perhaps, someone from Silvia’s background, which is white, unfairly thought that minorities were only awarded spots in graduate school or within prestigious firms and other businesses simply because of a quota system. In other words, her cultural assumptions may not have allowed for the idea that other minority groups may have worked just as hard or been as intelligent as someone from the majority group is. This process unfairly built into itself several negative and grossly incorrect assumptions that lead to a hasty generalized connotation of members of an ethnic group that possessed different traits and qualities and as a result, these assumptions lead to the negative aspects of the narrative.

 

The Dutch Culturalist Charles Trompenaar developed a series of cultural factors that can be used to explain the constructs that allow certain cultural to interact with others. Furthermore, these factors can be used to place the narrative of this analysis within an academic framework in order to determine the nature of my colleague’s behavior and its implication (“Trompenaar’s Cultural Factors”, 2010).

 

These factors include: (1) Universalism v. Particularism. “Universalism is about finding broad and general rules. When no rules fit, it finds the best rule. Particularism is about finding exceptions. When no rules fit, it judges the case on its own merits, rather than trying to force-fit an existing rule” (“Trompenaar’s Cultural Factors”, 2010). In this sense, Universalism is much like the hasty generalization concept that a “quota” system was responsible for allowing Nicky to secure the position. From a Particularism concept, unfortunately Sylvia did not allow her cultural assumptions to account for exceptions. Another way analyzing this incident is to look from Individualism and Communitariansim perspectives. Clearly, Sylvia’s comment toward Nicky demonstrated a communitarian attitude in that there was an inherent assumption that all members of Nicky’s ethnic group would have been given positions based solely on ethnic status.

 

It is clear that Trompenaar’s cultural factors lay out the core principle that Sylvia’s comment described in the initial narrative fits the logical construct of being an unfair, hasty generalization. This fits with the previous construct derived by Hofstede. Indeed, it could be asserted that both Trompenaar and Hofstede’s models intersect on a more gen本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。