英语论文网

Direct impact on the economic case against the operating efficiency of commercial banks, and may affect the normal business operations of commercial banks, and even the impact of normal working order commercial banks. Therefore, the analysis of lost economic cases, seek countermeasures to reduce or avoid losing the case, undoubtedly has a very important practical significance for preventing and resolving commercial banks operating in the legal risk, improve operational efficiency of commercial banks.

CAUSE against external economic cases

Flawed legislation

In recent years, it has made great achievements in building financial law, but also a lot of problems and defects. These defects and deficiencies to the case of commercial banks had a negative impact on the economic litigation, outstanding performance in three areas:

(1) Legislation blank vulnerabilities. Although a large number of existing legislation is now increasing, but there are still a lot of careless and gaps, many problems can not follow, given the economic litigation cases commercial banks had a negative impact. If the current legislation is now on the boundaries of existing crimes and personal crimes division is unclear, resulting in the emergence of the individual criminal qualitative unlimited expansion phenomenon in judicial practice, individual staff members in many criminal acts without the slightest relationship with the bank job crimes were identified as the judiciary, thus making the commercial banks in the subsequent lawsuit against the victim in and assume responsibility for the loss of the victim eventually passed on to the bank commitments.[1]

Judicial corruption

Court sided emphasis on the protection of the weak and error-prone

Internal CAUSE losing economic cases

1, illegal off-balance operating and running the company in the aftermath.  

2, lax management, internal control mechanism is not perfect or not seriously implemented. 

3, paid insufficient attention to the legal affairs, severely restricted the legal work to play legal risk prevention functions. 

4, the legal staff learning initiative insufficient legal knowledge to update the law can not keep up the pace of development.

5, pre-litigation argument is not enough. Exhaustive pretrial litigation argument is an important guarantee of quality. 

6, responsible for the bank's internal punishment ineffective. 

7, choosing the right people, "capable" to sell the line. 

Conclusion

Reference

1. Brunner, Allan D.; Decressin, Jörg; Hardy, Daniel C. L.; Kudela, Beata (2004-06-21). Germany's Three-Pillar Banking System: Cross-Country Perspectives in Europe. International Monetary Fund. ISBN 1-58906-348-1. ISSN 0251-6365.

2. Khambata, Dara (1996). The practice of multinational banking: macro-policy issues and key international concepts (2nd ed.). New York: Quorum Books. p. 320. ISBN 978-0-89930-971-2.

3. Commercial Banks direc本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。