英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

英国南安普敦大学report需求

论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:职称论文 Scholarship Papers登出时间:2011-03-29编辑:zn1987点击率:4178

论文字数:2035论文编号:org201103291326382127语种:英语 English地区:英国价格:$ 22

关键词:UKInsurance Law Monthlylaw

Insurance Law Monthly
View whole of
• Issue 4, April
• Articles
• Anti-suit injunctions ...
ILM 19 4 (1)
1 April 2007
Anti-suit injunctions
Proceedings in the EEA
Professor R M Merkin
LL.B, LL.M
Lloyd's Law Reports
Professor of Commercial Law
Southampton University

© INFORMA UK LTD 2007
In its controversial decision in Through Transport Mutual Insurance Association (Eurasia) Ltd v New India Assurance Co Ltd [2005] 1 Lloyd's Rep 67, the Court of Appeal established, albeit only for the purposes of English law, that the usual power of the English courts to restrain a party — by way of anti-suit injunction — from pursuing judicial proceedings https://www.51lunwen.org/liuxuelunwendx/in breach of an arbitration clause was available irrespective of the location of the court in which the foreign proceedings were commenced. In so deciding, the Court of Appeal held that the jurisdiction rules operating within the European Union and European Free Trade Association (EFTA), enshrined respectively in Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 and the Lugano Convention, did not affect the jurisdiction of the English courts in this regard. In West Tankers Inc v RAS Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA, The Front Comor [2005] 2 Lloyd's Rep 257 Colman J followed the reasoning of the Court of Appeal. That decision has been appealed to the House of Lords under an expedited procedure which allowed the case to leapfrog the Court of Appeal. The House of Lords, in West Tankers Inc v RAS Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA, The Front Comor [2007] UKHL 4, has now decided that it is unclear whether the result of Through Transport is a correct interpretation of the European jurisdiction rules, and the House of Lords took the step of referring the question to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. Pending that ruling, the English courts will doubtless continue to apply the existing rule and to grant relief in appropriate circumstances, although there must be considerable doubt as to whether this approach will ultimately be upheld by the European Court of Justice. This matter is of crucial importance to insurers and reinsurers alike.
INSURANCE
The issue
Regulation 44/2001 lays down the general principle that, as between the courts of the EU Member States, the court first seised of any proceedings has exclusive jurisdiction over those proceedings. If there is a challenge to the jurisdiction of the court first seised, then only that court can determine whether or not it possesses jurisdiction. The Regulation does not, however, apply to 'arbitration'. In two landmark decisions, Erich Gasser GmbH v MISAT Srl (Case C-1l6/02) [2003] ECR I-4693 and Turner v Grovit (Case C-159/02) [2004] ECR I-3565, the European Court of Justice held that if there is a challenge to the jurisdiction of the court first seised on the ground that the parties have agreed to the jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State, the court first seised alone can determine the validity and meaning of the exclusive jurisdiction clause. The effect of those rulings was that it ceased to be permissible for an EEA court to entertain an application for an anti-suit injunction in support of an exclusion jurisdiction clause where another EEA court had been first seised of the proceedings allegedly commenced in breach of contract. The question left unanswered by Gasser and Turner was whether the same rule applie论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/2 页首页上一页12下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非