英语论文网

The Wullar lake as it exists today is enough for passage of small boats. Indian design for 320,000 MAF capacity dam for the same is thus a gross violation. Though Indian plans is acceptable as per Article 3 (4) conditions, which are enlisted in Annex D and E of the Treaty but impinges on Pakistans water security. The actual reason for Pakistans worry is that such a barrage will damage its own Triple – Canal Project which links Chenab and Jhelum with the Upper Bari Doab Canal. The aspect also has strategic implication for Pakistan as it will allow crossing over the river by controlling flow of the river from the barrgage.

Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project

Another thorn in the water issue is the Kishenganga Project which is a 330 MW hydroelectric project. It is located about 160 km upstream of Muzaffarabad and involves diversion of Kishanganga or Neelum River, as is known in Pakistan, to a tributary, Bunar Madumati Nullah of the River Jhelum through a 22-kilomtre tunnel.

Pakistan has objected to it on the ground of its impact on its indigenous Neelam-Jhelum link project that Pakistan initiated in 1988. The Indian project, if constructed as planned design will result into 13.4% reduction in the average annual inflows of river at Neelum-Jhelum Dam site and 10.2% reduction in the overall power generation. The major worry is of its impact on the water flow in Pakistan administered Kashmir as the project will reduce Pakistan’s total water availability from an estimated 154 MAF to about 140 MAF, a shortage of about 8-9 per cent and the flow of River Jhelum by 27 %. [3] It also contravenes the provisions of Paragraph 10 of Annexure E to the Treaty regarding diversion of flow of one tributary (Kishanganga) to another tributary (Bonar-Madmati Nallah).

Baglihar Hydel Power Project

The project by India envisages construction of a 450 MW hydroelectric project on River Chenab near Ramban. The designs of the project were provided to Pakistan in 1992. Pakistan objected to it as the the project contravene to any catchment area on Pakistan’s share of river. The fear was also compounded by the official receipt of only 20-25,000 cusecs from Chenab in 2009 as against flow of 55,000 cusecs. The overall effect has led to significant drop in agriculture production. Strategic experts in Pakistan have also spoken of security and economic implications due to increased control of India over water supplies to Pakistan. The objections officially communicated to India include the following [4] :-

The works themselves appeared to be capable of raising artificially the water level beyond the full pondage le本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。