英语论文网

f education and society.

In this development, the faculties notice the economic advantages that come along the partnerships with corporate markets and embrace the culture of commercialization of university research. This sets unfortunate scenario where the universities have turned a blind eye to this relationship which is destroying the culture and the essence of research institutions. The researchers have lost their freedom of researching according to their quest for knowledge and new ideas. The emphasis is now on short-term gains from the commercial institutions. It is unfortunate that the government, which should be defending universities and researchers from incorrect activities by commercial organizations, are actually supporting it. A good example is the support given to mathematics and science oriented subject by the Obama administration in April 2009. The president showed his strong support for the so called STEM, which stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, mathematics. The government not only promised to devote its resources and support in STEM but also immediately injected 5 billion dollars in the project (Johnson). Such move not only grant coverage to many marketing corporate which reaches out to the science faculties, but also shows the governmental influence university institutional culture.

Robert Jonson, with his article balancing acts, condemns this activity of failing to give humanities the attention and funding they deserve. He finds the biased manner in which the funding is done in various sciences related institutions and research projects uncalled for. He lengthily discusses the question of ethics, which he refers to as “looking into the future”. As far as matters to do with future are concerned, there should be involvement of humanity subjects like Philosophy, History and Social Sciences (Johnson). It is irresponsible to leave out these disciplines which contribute considerably in the community development and cater for future improvements. It is no doubt that scientific research projects have become quite expensive. However, funding science related faculties in the expense of humanities based research projects is inappropriate.

The effects of biased funding not only affect the functioning of the universities and colleges but also the social-economic values in the community. With his article whose title partly reads Universities, governments and industry, Young argues about the pressure of commercialization in universities. He contends that the nature of universities has changed from the notion of acquiring knowledge and new ideas for the societal benefit “engines of short-term economic gains” for governments and industries (Young). The psychological and neuroscience departments are a good example. Research priorities are given to the pharmaceutical industries which experience high demands of antidepressant drugs than to emphasis on psychotherapy and well-being of the patients. The society, which should benefit from research from higher institutions, also suffers a significant deal (Forest and Phillip). This is because, the traditional concepts where university research projects we geared towards the well-fare of the society has now shifted towards the commercial gains. It is understandable that most of the manufactured drugs are unaffordable to a vast majority especially in the developing nations.

In humanities, the trend is also not diffe