英语论文网

rent. For instance, humanity faculties that are in a position to garner greater income receive more funds from some corporate and governmental institutions. This includes the faculties which deal with museums and cultural heritage, which earn the nation some considerable revenues. However, the funds and patents in these research fields are still minimal in comparison to science subjects that give more direct financial benefits to the interest groups (Forest and Phillip)

In conclusion, the intrusion of the government and market corporate in university undertakings do more harm than good. The biased funding of a research study violates the academic freedom and denies the society the full benefits from the learning institutions. In addition, the critical role played by the humanities in developing culture and social values should not be undermined. If given equal attention and funding, humanities can even help in solving some of the economic matters confronting the world today. However, there should be more studies on the best and most balanced ways of funding university projects without affecting their functioning.

参考文献——Work Cited

Forest, James J. F., and Philip G. Altbach. International handbook of higher education.

Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. Print.

Harriet Zuckerman & Ronald G. Ehrenberg. Recent trends in funding for the academic

 humanities & their implications. (2009)

Johnson, Robert R.. A Case for Confronting the Tyranny of STEM. Michigan Technological

University. 2010.

McMurtry, John: University wars: The corporate administration vs. the vocation of learning.

Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Jul/Aug 2009.

Young, Simon. Universities, governments and industry: Can the essential nature of

universities survive the drive to commercialize? Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience:

JPN 2005 Apr; 30(3)
本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。