英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

战略组织的决定

论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:作业 Assignment登出时间:2016-04-28编辑:zhaotianyun点击率:10607

论文字数:3527论文编号:org201604262045197691语种:英语 English地区:澳大利亚价格:免费论文

关键词:战略组织Strategic Organizations需求函数

摘要:摘要:本文主要讲述了未来人力资源部门的作用和功能。

战略组织的决定
Strategic Organizations Decision

批判性评价的证据是现在人力资源管理在组织战略层面的决策中成为其组成部分。

未来的人力资源部门,在它的作用、功能和大小方面有许多预测。主要的男高音一直呼吁人力资源功能更战略与组织内创造价值(Gunter, 2006. P.49).人力资源功能历来受到抨击,因为他们认为反应迟钝,他们的管理而不是战略重点和自然视为成本中心,而非创造财富中心 (Truss et al., 2002). 面对日益国际化的组织中,人力资源功能被认为是协调能力和实践发展的一个关键因子(Ferner, 1997)

但是,正如Pucik(1997:321)认为,矛盾的是,人力资源对竞争优势的贡献,尽管价值增加的机会,由当今企业许多人力资源的需求函数不是仍然被认为是一个完整的伙伴”。这句话进一步被希恩支持。K(2005),据报道强调,人力资源没有完全参与中央决策过程。

她的工作还表明,在一些组织中,尽管人力资源被邀请是决策委员会的一部分,他一定不是一个整体战略规划过程的一部分。但希恩的工作仅限于只有13个“最佳实践”的公司;如果这是所谓的最佳实践公司的情况,我们可以想象其他组织的情况。

希恩提出的战略人力资源管理模型,几乎没有影响。例如如果我们考虑CEO承诺,人力资源直接向CEO汇报,理论上听起来不错,但它有问题是否可以在现实生活中存在。

战略组织决定——Strategic Organizations Decision

Critically evaluate the evidence that HRM is now an integral part of strategic level decision making within organizations.

There have been many predictions for the future role of the HR department, its role, function and size. The predominant tenor of such calls has been for the HR function to be more strategic and to create value within organizations (Gunter, 2006. P.49). HR functions have traditionally come under fire because of their perceived unresponsiveness, their administrative rather than strategic focus and their perceived nature as cost centres rather than wealth creation centres (Truss et al., 2002). In the face of growing internationalization of organizations, the HR function is seen to be a key subunit in the development of capability and the coordination of practice (Ferner, 1997)

But, as Pucik (1997:321) argues, ‘paradoxically, in spite of the value adding opportunities for HR contribution to competitive advantage driven by the demands of businesses in many companies today the HR function is still perceived not as a full partner’. This statement is further supported by the work of Sheehan.K (2005), which reportedly stresses that HR was not fully involved in central decision-making process.

Her work also reveals that in few organizations although HR was invited to be a part of the decisions making committee, he is necessarily not an integral part of the strategic planning process. But the work of Sheehan is limited to only 13 ‘Best practice’ firms only; if this is the case in so called best practice firms then we can imagine the situation in other organizations.

The strategic HRM model proposed by Sheehan.k has few implications for instance if we consider the CEO commitment, HR reporting directly to CEO, it sounds good on paper but is it questionable whether it is possible in real life or not. Again it depends on the relationship between HR and CEO. What if the relationship between HR and CEO does not exist? What if the CEO doesn’t support the HR? It is crucial for the CEO to support HR and in real life it might be possible in only a few organizations.

How can we achieve Top management commitment to HR initiatives and corporate culture commitment to HR initiatives? Again it needs to be led by the CEO and these initiatives must be incorporated in though out the entire company which is quite a challenging thing. Sheehan.K (2003) also proposed that there should be an increase in line management HR responsibilities which was also proposed by Ulrich (1997), again this has a lot of implications like resistance from line managers and resistance from HR.

论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/3 页首页上一页123下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非