纳博科夫与艾略特:形式主义关照下文学理论与文本实践的张力分析 [5]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2017-11-24编辑:lgg点击率:6153
论文字数:38475论文编号:org201711181906481035语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
关键词:英语文学论文形式主义理论历史质素张力
摘要:本文是英语文学论文,本文选取了纳博科夫的五部短篇小说和艾略特的《普鲁弗洛克的情歌》,通过分析纳博科夫与艾略特文学理论与文本实践的张力,换句话说,就是文学与非文学作品,认为他们文学影响的伟大之处就在于把形式主义技巧和历史质素结合在一起形成了一种张力。
alence in this poem should be the title, “love song”indicates it as a lyric, which is the predominant form of English romantic poetry.While the name of “J. Alfred Prufrock” seems like a full name, it only appeared in thename cards and seems not romantic at all. “The romantic lyric aspires to a universalvoice, avoiding historical and geographic identifiers that would mark the speaker as aspecific individual in time and preferring metaphor” (Dickey 126). Thus a sense ofambivalence and confusion spread out at the outset of this poem.
............
CONCLUSION
This thesis, tends to analyze the formalistic devices and historical factors inNabokov and Eliot’s fictional and non-fictional works, arguing that there exist atension in their theories and practices formed by the juxtaposition of the formalisticdevices and historical factors. And the existence of such tension makes their worksbecome classic and thus perfects the Formalism as well.At the very beginning of Introduction, this thesis explains the reason whyNabokov and Eliot are chosen as the research objects. That is, Nabokov is recognizedas a text-central writer while Eliot is the representative of the New Criticism. Both ofthem consider the literary text in a supreme position. Then after the literature review,the research gap of this thesis is found, which provides a clearer direction for thefollowing research. Although the research in academic field on these two giants hasbeen abundant enough, the perspective in this thesis is few discussed. Thus thetheoretical framework set Formalism as a background, explains Nabokov and Eliiot’srespective links with Formalism. And the tension theory is also mentioned. In this way,the structure of this thesis is built up. With the lead of Formalism, their respectivetension is illustrated in their specific works.Both Nabokov and Eliot devote to defamiliarizing the form of literary works toput burden on the reader so that the pleasure of literature can be perceived morethoroughly. Nabokov applies complicated designation in his short stories such as “TheVane Sisters” and “Signs and Symbols” to achieve the same purpose; Eliotdeliberately uses the ambivalence to cause paradox or tension in structure tostrengthen the poetical effects. Nabokov dedicates to Shklovsky’s estrangementtheory a lot and Eliot’s main concern is the “depersonalization” theory of poetry. Mostof Nabokov’s works have a shadow of past memories, while Eliot’s “Tradition and theIndividual Talent” is regarded as his critical pronouncements about traditional orhistorical views, which got a full demonstration in his The Love Song of J. AlfredPrufrock.
..........
References (abbreviated)
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。