英语论文网

Final assignment Contextualisation最终分配语境化

By the time you get to the fourth component of this module your group will have already considered its knowledge claim from three distinct yet developmentally interrelated perspectives. These three perspectives will have formed the basis for each of the three ways in which your work will have been assessed. Assignment one tested your group’s ability to conform to prevalent academic writing protocols when making a knowledge claim. Assignment two then honed in on your group’s ability to present a rhetorically convincing argument concerning that knowledge claim. The third assignment proceeded to focus upon your group’s strategic and organisational skills regarding this knowledge claim, particularly insofar as your ability to communicate with multiple stakeholders was concerned. The fourth part of this module’s assessment will finally consider your group’s capacity for self-criticism with respect to its knowledge claim’s philosophical basis.你得到的第四个组成部分的时候，该作业组已经考虑其知识要求从三个不同但相互关联的方面发展。这三个方面将形成三种方式你的工作将被评定的基础。分配一个测试组的能力，以符合普遍的学术写作协议时，知识要求。然后分配两个磨练，在你的能力有关的知识要求提出一个反问说服力的论据。第三次分配着手，专注于集团的战略和组织能力，对于这方面的知识要求，尤其是你的沟通能力与多个利益相关者关注。此模块的评估第四部分最终会考虑你的团队的能力方面的知识要求的哲学基础与自我批评。


Assignment Four Guidelines分配四项准则

The materials covered during the fourth segment of the module will offer you the resources for a critical engagement with your knowledge claim. For the purposes of the final assignment, you will argue whether knowledge is even possible, philosophically speaking, with respect to the claim you have been making throughout the year. The assignment will take the form of a 1,500 word critical essay within which you subject your group’s knowledge claim to epistemological scrutiny. This final segment of the module tests your ability to offer an accurate account of a set of challenging ideas, as well as your ability to apply these challenging ideas to your longer going concerns. Your essay must be structured along the following lines:在第四分部的模块所涉及的材料，将为您提供一个关键的参与与你的知识要求的资源。对于最终被分配的目的，你会争论是否知识，甚至有可能，从哲学上讲，与你已经一年四季索赔。转让将于1500字的批评文章，在其中，你的知识认识论的审查要求受到的形式。这个模块的最后一段测试你的能力，提供一套具有挑战性的想法，以及你的能力，适用于这些具有挑战性的想法，你不再去关注一个准确的帐户。你的文章必须结构大意如下：

1. Introduction 1。介绍
在这里，你的论点的形状和运动的您提供一个简洁的帐户
2。训诂部
在这里，您提供您解释您已选择借鉴的哲学模式（ S） ，通过援引原件和补充来源
3。应用部分
在这里，你受到你的知识要求在上一节讨论的哲学模式（ S）审议
4 。讨论小组
在这里，你认为是否可以建立在你的知识要求的您选择为什么或者为什么不讨论这个问题来讲，你的理由和发展的哲学基础
Here you offer a succinct account of the shape and movements of your argument 
2. Exegetical Section
Here you offer your interpretation of the philosophical model(s) you have chosen to draw on, by citing original and supplementary sources 
3. Application Section
Here you subject your knowledge claim to the scrutiny of the philosophical model(s) discussed within the previous section
4. Discussion Section
Here you argue whether or not your knowledge claim can be founded upon the philosophical base you chose to discuss it in terms of, and develop your reasons as to why or why not 

Your essay will be assessed along 5 key criteria:你的文章将沿5个关键标准进行评估：

1。您的帐户的使用哲学体系的准确性
2。你有能力提供技术上有说服力的情况下，问题的知识要求选择特定的哲学体系的相关性
3。你的能力提供修辞说服力的情况下，特定的哲学体系的相关问题的知识要求选择
4 。你的能力，磨练对哲学的缺陷以及哲学守得住方面的索赔，你已经使整个
5 。你的能力，以符合学术写作规范
1. The accuracy of your account of the philosophical system utilised
本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。