英语论文网

cept between China and the U.S., reasons for these differences, diachroniccomparison, relationship between the security concept and national interests.

Chinese scholars pay special attention to the differences of national security conceptbetween China and the U.S.. Jiang and Lv (2018), Zhou and Fu (2014) compare the differenceswith reference to the ways of thinking, security threats, goals and means of achieving thesegoals. With regard to the reasons, they provide further explanations by taking factors ofnational power, international position, political system, ideology, national interests, culturaltradition, historical experience, and geopolitical condition into consideration. Similarly, Guoand Nie (2004), Zhu (2007), Zhang (2011), Liao and Sun (2018) conduct in-depth research onthese issues. In addition, diachronic comparison of the U.S. national security concept is madeby other scholars (Guo, 2004, 2007; Peng, 2007; Zhou & Fu, 2014; Liao, 2015; Gao, 2019).They explore the security concept according to significant events and strategies in particularhistorical periods and thus clarify the common and divergent characteristics of it.

.............................

CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK,METHODOLOGY AND DATA DESCRIPTION............. 9

3.1 Theory Comparison......................9

3.1.1 Discourse Analysis ................................9

3.1.2 Critical Discourse Analysis .......................10

CHAPTER FOUR DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION............. 14

4.1 Introduction ................................14

4.2 Identifying Discursive Features of the National Security Concept...................14

CHAPTER FIVE SYNTHETIC ASSESSMENT AND EXPLANATION . 31

5.1 Introduction .........................31

5.2 Understanding the Rhetorical Functions ....................31

CHAPTER FIVE SYNTHETIC ASSESSMENT AND EXPLANATION

5.1 Introduction

A comprehensive explanation will be taken up in this chapter with the approach ofCultural Discourse Studies, which focuses on purposes, historical and intercultural relations ofbuilding up America’s national security concept. Additionally, possible factors that might havehelped shape the current security concept will be discussed as well, expecting to achieve adeeper understanding of America’s concept of national security.

According to Cultural Discourse Studies, discourse does not only refer to the text itself,but is profoundly concerned with a set of interrelated categories for interpreting discursiveevents. In particular, purpose of the communicative action will be taken into consideration. Asfor the 2017 NSS document, which is released at a certain time, must embodies specific aims.In other words, the document is not an isolated text but embraces diverse factors concealedbehind. In this section, the motives of constructing the current America’s national securityconcept will be evaluated as a part of extension of that concept.

The document is released after the Trump Administration come into power for only elevenmonths, the period of which is shorter than that of G. W. Bush and of Obama. One importantreason may lie in the highly problematic establishment of Trump’s national security system(Burke, 2017, p本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。