英语论文网

s and it will be used by training managers (actors) to gain my target effects.
This seem deductive (you can say rational) (thinking approach) because out of my detailed study of the literature and in particular the concepts found in Emotional Intelligence offer a theory of how these troublesome sorts of incidents can be handled and eventually mostly prevented thus it is an adequate description of anger management in the work place. With this theory in mind I will look for illustrations of anger incidents (spotlight) and how they were dealt with hence Vignettes (Research Method) is an appropriate method and it follows that the work is largely qualitative (Research Style). (187 words)
(3) NGVTech had difficulty in managing projects tasks and allocate materials simultaneously, including making adjustments and providing correct data to the finance for reporting (problem). The purpose is to provide a feasibility report that would assist the management of NGVTech (actor) in its decision to proceed with its plan in evaluating and acquiring a suitable integrated system to support its growth and maintain its level of competitiveness in the industry (target).
I intend to explore inductively (thinking approach) the current business processes related to warehousing to assess the full extent of the problem and its complexity. This is to establish the requirements and the sort of system that would be suitable to handle current volume and more. With a detailed literature review on integrated systems, particularly on the idea of an ERP for the shipyard environment, would help me structure alternative solutions and desirable future state.
To form the components of the feasibility report (outcome), I will use a survey approach (research method) that would include interviews, questionnaire and observations to identify and describe the operational, technical and financial needs, capability and constraints (spotlight). Thus, my research style is largely qualitative (research style) in nature.
Tutor Review – this is generally good but although induction has been chosen here it is not clear we have any rationale for that. The same applies to the choice of survey, it may be right but no rationale supports it.
Common Errors – there is only one error here and it’s not so much that students try hard but find it difficult but find it difficult so don’t try at all. When this latter thing happens students just add in the key words: inductive, Research method, Quantitative and so on but without any understanding and effectively invent fanciful rationales of their own all in some vain hope that as long as it sounds remotely correct things will turn out alright.
The trouble with this is we then get nonsense answers of the form “my approach is deductive because my data is qualitative” or “my research method is an Action Rationale where I will use a questionnaire sent by email” or “my data spotlight is observation” and so on.
One final element of confusion is that students can very often not make any distinction between the data and its method of collection; “my primary data is a questionnaire” or choose a method of collection long before they have any idea what the primary data is.
Q4a/b Aim and Objectives
What is your single project aim and its associated project objectives
This if often an area of real weakness and it seems largely to be caused by the feeling in almost everyone that they know how to write an aim and objectiv