英语论文网

留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal

英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献

ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter

澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文

小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法

英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查

temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语

经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目

日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题

职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意

商务英语翻译论文广告英语商务英语商务英语教学

无忧论文网

联系方式

基于语料库的中西学者英语学术论文言据性对比思考 [2]

论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 dissertation登出时间:2022-04-23编辑:vicky点击率:1996

论文字数:33526论文编号:org202204182158334576语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 44

关键词:英语论文格式

摘要:本文是一篇英语论文格式,本研究构建了国际语言学期刊的学术论文语料库,对中西方学者使用的证据性进行对比研究。由于本研究考虑的是广义的证据性,因此我们应该根据证据的语义功能来研究证据在语料库中的实现和分布。因此,本研究发现了中西方学者在使用证据方面的异同。

, to present similarities and differences between themand English-native writers, so as to promote their understanding to evidentiality when theywrite articles for international journals in the field of linguistics.

Chapter Two Literature Review

2.1 Definitions of Evidentiality

It is widely accepted that evidentiality indicates sources of information which istransmitted by a writer or a speaker. However, definitions of evidentiality haven’t reached aconsensus. Generally, evidentiality has been defined in narrow and broad senses, in particularafter Chafe first put forward the definition of evidentiality in a broad sense in the collectionEvidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (1986) (Mushin, 2001:18). The definitionproposed by Anderson (1986) is usually regarded as a representative in a narrow sense, whilethe definition put forward by Chafe (1986) is generally seen as a representative in a broadsense. Later more scholars have made their own interpretations of evidentiality in these twosenses.

In a broad sense, evidentiality mainly refers to sources of information and speaker’sattitude towards the credibility of information. In this sense, evidentiality can be studied fromfunction to form, that is, to consider semantic functions of evidentiality first, and then studytheir linguistic realization (Hu, 1994a; Plungian, 2001; Fang, 2006). Chafe (1986) definedevidentiality as a range of epistemological considerations coded linguistically in language,and took speaker’s attitude into consideration (Chafe, 1986:262). Mushin (2001) alsosuggested that evidentiality was related to the mode of knowing, such as the source ofinformation, and speakers’ subjective expressions of information (Mushin, 2001:18). Heinsisted on exploring epistemological position behind evidentiality system, and focused onspeakers’ speech acts, which was helpful for pragmatic studies on evidentiality (Mushin,2001:51).

2.2 Classifications of Evidentiality

Different definitions of evidentiality contribute to different classification criteria (Fang,2006). Although scholars around the world have been studying the definition of evidentialitymore and more intensively, they have not reached a consensus yet. Many scholars havepresented their different understandings of evidentiality, which leads to the coexistence of avariety of classification criteria. These criteria will be reviewed from broad and narrowsenses.

In a broad sense, Chafe (1986) did not agree to regard some languages like English aslanguages without the ability to code evidentiality (Hu, 1994a: 11), and depicted an evidentialsystem with four levels: source of knowledge, mode of knowing, reliability of knowledge,and factors that knowledge matched against. He held the view that different sources ofknowledge could determine different ways to acquire knowledge, and reliability ofknowledge acquired from different sources could be various. Finally, new knowledge wouldinteract with knowledge acquired earlier. This kind of interaction covered whether theknowledge could be expressed explicitly by words and whether it was in line with people’sexpectations. Chafe’s model is shown in Figure 2.1.

英语论文格式怎么写

Chapter Three Theoretical Framework...................15

3.论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非