英语论文网

nts here
addressed the research issue?
Consider:
– if the setting for data collection was justified
– if it is clear how data were collected (e.g. focus
group, semi-structured interview etc)
– if the researcher has justified the methods
chosen
– if the researcher has made the methods explicit
(e.g. for interview method, is there an indication
of how interviews were conducted, did they
used a topic guide?)
– if methods were modified during the study. If so,
has the researcher explained how and why?
– if the form of data is clear (e.g. tape recordings,
video material, notes etc)
– if the researcher has discussed saturation of
data
Reflexivity (research partnership relations/recognition of researcher bias)
6. Has the relationship between researcher and Write comments here
participants been adequately considered?
Consider whether it is clear:
– if the researcher critically examined their own
role, potential bias and influence during:
– formulation of research questions
– data collection, including sample recruitment
and choice of location
– how the researcher responded to events during
the study and whether they considered the
implications of any changes in the research
design
Ethical Issues
7. Have ethical issues been taken into Write comments here
consideration?
Consider:
– if there are sufficient details of how the research
was explained to participants for the reader to
assess whether ethical standards were
maintained
– if the researcher has discussed issues raised by
the study (e. g. issues around informed consent
or confidentiality or how they have handled the
effects of the study on the participants during
and after the study)
– if approval has been sought from the ethics
© Public Health Resource Unit, England (2006). All rights reserved.
committee
Data Analysis
8. Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? Write comments here
Consider:
– if there is an in-depth description of the analysis
process
– if thematic analysis is used. If so, is it clear how
the categories/themes were derived from the
data?
– whether the researcher explains how the data
presented were selected from the original
sample to demonstrate the analysis process
– if sufficient data are presented to support the
findings
– to what extent contradictory data are taken
into account
– whether the researcher critically examined their
own role, potential bias and influence during
analysis and selection of data for presentation
Findings
9. Is there a clear statement of findings? Write comments here
Consider:
– if the findings are explicit
– if there is adequate discussion of the evidence
both for and against the researcher’s arguments
– if the researcher has discussed the credibility of
their findings (e.g. triangulation, respondent
validation, more than one analyst.)
– if the findings are discussed in relation to the
original research questions
Value of the research
10. How valuable is the research? Write comments here
Consider:
– if the researcher discusses the contribution the
study makes to existing knowledge or
understanding (e.g. do they consider the
findings in relation to current practice or policy,
or relevant research-based literature?)
– if they identify new areas where research is
necessary
– if the r