基于语料库的英语学习者使用的英语语义韵综合同义词研究 [2]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2017-09-14编辑:lgg点击率:5060
论文字数:38596论文编号:org201709062021191520语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
关键词:英语语言学论文搭配语义韵语料库
摘要:本文是英语语言学论文,本研究的数据和分析程序,可立即使用的教师也可以用这种方法来做同义词的语料库为基础的课堂教学研究是便捷、高效的为它大量的地道的英语表达,使得可供学生。
instruction, students’ enthusiasm in English learning can be largelyenhanced. Learning the use of corpora and corpus analysis software is a graduallyproficient process, as long as the main operating steps are mastered, students can learnvocabulary themselves after class. Corpus-based English learning can be veryinteresting and efficient.
.........
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Collocation
Firth (1957: 12) puts forward his famous viewpoint “You shall know a word bythe company it keeps”. According to Firth’s view, co-occurrence and mutualexpectancy are two main features of collocation. Firth (1957) advocates
statistics asthe method of analyzing collocations, that is, analyzing collocation in concordancelines. His foundation of the definition “collocation” makes great contribution to thedevelopment of corpus linguistic. However, this definition is not sufficient andsystematic enough and deficiencies mainly lie in the following aspects. Firstly, Firthdoes not put forward strict criteria of judging collocation. Secondly, he does not pointout to what extent should collocation be grammatically restricted.Yang Huizhong (2002) classifies the definition of collocation into two types: thebroad sense and the narrow sense. The broad sense is represented by M. Halliday andJ. Sinclair who are representatives of Neo-Firthians. The narrow sense is representedby G. Kjellmer. Halliday (1976: 75) defines collocation as “ Lexis seems to requirethe recognition merely of linear co-occurrence together with some measure ofsignificant proximity, either a scale or at least a cutting point. ” It is this syntagmaticrelation which is referred to as collocation. We can know from Halliday’s viewpointthat he also does not require that collocation should be grammatically restricted. Takethis famous sentence for example “ I wasn’t together convinced by his argument. Hehad some strong points but they could all be met” (Yang Huizhong, 2002: 85). InHalliday’s point of view, “strong” and “argument” can be regarded as collocationalthough they are not grammatically restricted. Halliday’s definition of collocation isdifficult for many experts and scholars to accept. However, many new terms such as“node word” , “collocates” and “span” and the way of calculating collocabilitydefinitely make great contribution to study of vocabulary use.
.........
2.2 Semantic Prosody
The term “semantic prosody” was originated from Firth’s phonological prosodywhich refers to the influence and coordination of adjoining phonology in the processof combination. Sinclair (1987) transferred it into semantic relations and created theterm “semantic prosody” . Studies of semantic prosody have lasted for more than 20years till now, but researchers have not reached an agreement on this definition. Ingeneral, there are two main viewpoints. Morley& Partington (2009) hold thatsemantic prosody is the feature or property of lexical item which has semanticprosody itself and classify semantic prosody into positive, negative and neutral. Theyconsider positive and negative meanings are core meanings of semantic prosody(Hoey, 2005: 23). However, many researchers argue against this view and hold thatsemantic prosody exists in discourse, not in lexical items. Stubbs (2001a) proposes“pragmatic discourse” to emphasize that semantic prosody lies in discourse but not inwords. Although Sinclair and Huston are unsatisfied with Partington’s view, the
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。