英语论文网

摘要：本文是一篇英语语言学论文，本文的局限性主要在于分析在泄洪条件下的充分性。首先，影响泄洪的因素很多，或者说影响省略号的因素来源很多，因此，对泄洪条件的分析还不够全面和深入，需要进一步探索。其次，省略句只是省略的一种类型。泄句与其他省略形式之间是否存在内在一致性，还需要进一步的分析和论证。最后，语言事实有限，需要收集更详细的材料。

4.1.1 Identity Condition ............................... 28

4.1.2 Licensing Condition ........................................ 31

Chapter Five Derivation of English and Chinese Sluicing Sentences ......................... 44

5.1 Syntactic Position in English and Chinese Sluicing Sentences .......................... 44

5.1.1 The Syntactic Position of Focus....................................... 44

5.1.2 Hypothesis of the Generational Process of Sluicing Sentences ....................... 45

Chapter Five Derivation of English and Chinese Sluicing Sentences

5.1 Syntactic Position in English and Chinese Sluicing Sentences

Although English and Chinese sluicing sentences have some formal differences in the process of generation, sluicing sentences must satisfy the universal rules. Based on the cartographic theory, this thesis assumes that the remnants in sluicing sentences are firstly moved the wh-remnant as the focal component to the specifier position of FocP, and then it is generated by deleting a TP at the phonetic level.

5.1.1 The Syntactic Position of Focus

In the period of government and binding theory, CP is a complete category with internal structure, headwords, markers, and complements. The complement of CP is IP, which is later called TP, as shown in figure (1).

英语语言学论文参考

Rizzi (1997) puts forward the CP split hypothesis, which later became the cartographic theory. This view divides CP into ForceP, TopicP, FocusP and FiniteP based on an analysis of Italian. ForceP specializes in statement, question, subjunctive and other tone functions, TopicP specializes in topics, and FocP is responsible for presentation the focus function, FinP is used to indicate the for in English used to mark that and non-finite clauses in finite clauses, the order of the four nodes can be shown as (2). He believes that Force-Fin is unique to every sentence, while Top-Foc is dispensable and should only be used when there is a potential topic and focus in the sentence.

Chapter Six Conclusion

6.1 Major Findings

This thesis firstly generalized the language facts of English and Chinese sluicing sentences, analyzed the properties of sluicing, and compared the form expression of sluicing in these two languages. Then, this thesis explained the commonalities and differences form semantic and syntactic perspective. Finally, there is a syntactic derivation of English and Chinese sluicing sentences. The major findings contain the following aspects:

(1) Through the descriptive analysis of the linguistic facts of English and Chinese sluicing sentences, this thesis finds that both retain only special interrogative words in the form, and sluicing sentences in both the two languages are generated by deleting a clause with tense. Compared with English sluicing sentences, when the argumentative interrogative words are used as remnant, shi ‘be’ must be added. Besides, the Chinese zenmeyang ‘how’ cannot participate in sluicing sentences while English “how” can. Lastly, the correlate must be existed in Chinese sluicing sentences while English sluicing sentences sometimes not.

(2) Based on the commonality of English and Chinese sluic本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。