英语论文网

d, 2011, p. 1). Suvin (1988), a professional science fiction critic, defined science fiction as a genre based on an imagined alternative to the reader’s environment. Wu (2011), a Chinese science fiction writer and critics, considered that science fiction was a narrative literary work produced by the dual invasion of science and the future into reality. An extremely narrow definition was made by Freedman (2000), and he considered that science fiction was constructed by the works that grows out of the “pulp magazines” (p. 14). 

No consensus regarding the definition of science fiction has yet been reached, Nicholls and Clute (1995) provided a brief overview of the arguments which concluded that science fiction had been seen as a subculture. They considered that “the stories and novels in this subculture shared certain assumptions, linguistic and thematic codes which were embedded in the growing literature” (p. 312). For its subculture identity, science fiction has been ignored by mainstream literary critics (Fleming, 1977). Janes (1960) considered that most widely science fiction readers were “juveniles” (p. 172) and science fiction was “practically none of it deserves consideration as literature” (p. 173). However, other scholars shared opposite ideas. 

Chapter Three: Research Methodology ................................. 14

3.1 Data Collection and Corpus Construction........................... 14

3.2 Introduction to the Multi-Dimensional Analysis .......................... 16

3.3 Analytical Framework......................... 18

Chapter Four: Results of the Study ............................ 25

4.1 Overall Comparison of the Corpora........................... 25

4.2 Results on Dimension 1 .............................. 29

Chapter Five: Analysis and Discussion ............................. 80

5.1 Analysis and Discussion about the Variations on Dimension 1 ................... 80

5.2 Analysis and Discussion about the Variations on Dimension 2 ................... 85

Chapter Five: Analysis and Discussion

5.1 Analysis and Discussion about the Variations on Dimension 1

According to Biber (1998), Dimension 1 is labeled as “Involved versus Informational production” (p. 115) in the MD analysis. This dimension has interpreted to distinguish the differences between texts with an informational focus and texts with an involved focus. The dimension is further interpreted to distinguish the differences between texts with high informational density and texts with low informational density. 

From the results given in figure 4.1 and Table 4.11, the linguistic variations between the texts in Phase 1 and Phase 3 are the highest. With the help of multiple linear regression models, the salient features of Dimension 1 are identified. From the results given in table 4.4, the salient linguistic features of Phase 1 on Dimension 1 are characterized by frequent occurrences of NN (total other nouns), PIN (total prepositional phrases), FPP1 (first person pronouns), CONT (contractions), BEMA (be as main verb), THATD (subordinator that deletion), JJ (attributive adjectives), and PO本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。