英语论文网

      从以上分析可以看出，在90年代早期，由于使用所有的测量标准在传统的计划经济和“股东至上”的理念，立法观念的影响，中国的建议方案，未能充分利用公司的最新概念的理论成果在世界上发展的建议方案的立法问题，导致实践中的诸多问题的产生。因此，有必要进行适当的修订建议方案的立法在《公司法》通过公司理念的创新。

      From the above analysis it can be see that in the early 1990s, due to the impact of legislative concept of using ownerships as measurement standards in the traditional planned economy and concept of “shareholder first”, China's suggestion scheme failed to fully draw on the company'essays latest concept achievements in theoretical development in the world on the legislative issue of suggestion scheme, which results in the production of many problems in the practice. Therefore, it is necessary to implement appropriate amendment in the legislation of suggestion scheme in “Company Law” through adopting the innovation of company concept.

      首先，应该改变以所有权为标准划分的立法范畴的实践。随着经济体制改革的深入发展，国有经济的统治局面已经被打破，非公有制经济的快速发展。因此，公司法将从主要适应在过去的国有企业为适应国有企业同时非公有制企业的要求。
      Firstly, it should change the practice of taking ownership as standards for partitioning the legislative category. With the deep development of economic reform, the situation ruled by state-owned economy has been broken, the non-public economy developing rapidly. Therefore, the Company Law will be changed from the mainly adapting to state-owned enterprise in the past to adapting to the requirements of both state-owned enterprise and the enterprises of non-public ownership at the same time. Such changes require that the “Company Law” changes the practice of taking ownership as standards for partitioning the legislative category, and adopts a more universal approach. In other words, it should give the same treatment for both state-owned enterprise and the enterprises of non-public ownership in “Company Law” and other laws. All the rights of suggestion scheme system enjoyed in state-owned enterprise can also be enjoyed by employees in the enterprises of non-public ownership.
      Secondly, in the amendment of “Company Law”, it should remove the impact of “shareholders first”, replace it with the results of corporate social responsibility and stakeholders on the basis of learning from theoretical and latest achievements in legislation of foreign companies in a wide range , therefore, form the new corporate governance structure in harmonious coexistence which includes shareholders, creditors, operators, producers, consumers, providers and other stakeholders, provide employees with a legal basis to participate in corporate governance. Some scholars have suggested that as China's “Company Law” is a socialistic justice ", which should reflect China's characteristics, while revise “Company Law”, it should re-position the goal of company.
Add corporate social responsibility to the Article 1, legislative purpose of or Article 5 the purpose of company, clearly defined the dual objectives of company, thus to realize the dual purpose of profit-making of companies’ and social responsibility.
      Thirdly, under the premise of improving to improve the corporate governance structure, gradually improve suggestion scheme system. Some scholars believe that the framework of China's corporate governance structure belongs to the “dual system” model in the civil law system, the provisions for constitution of directorate generally follows the principles of shareholders’ govern本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。