学习者视角下高中英语课堂修正性反馈调查与分析 [3]
论文作者:www.51lunwen.org论文属性:硕士毕业论文 thesis登出时间:2017-09-30编辑:lgg点击率:6113
论文字数:38596论文编号:org201709251729304622语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 66
关键词:高中英语论文修正性反馈学习者回应学习者态度
摘要:本文是高中英语论文,本研究试图找出学生的错误,在高中英语课堂中教师的CF的关系,与学习者的态度和吸收,通过课堂观察、CF在课堂互动和学习者错误和学习者的吸收分布的研究。
p;Errors will be made regularly and frequently; while mistake is accidental and irregular, it is often not because of the lack of language competence, but because of the limited time or tension, stress and other objective conditions, native speaker’s slip of the tongue is a typical example. In this study, error and mistake are not distinguished.
..........
2.2 Studies on CF Abroad and at Home
Because of the significance of CF for language learning, a large number of researchers have conducted descriptive and empirical studies on it. The following sections introduce a relevant review of the major researches on CF both abroad and at home, and make a summary about their findings. In language teaching classroom, the CF refers to the teacher’s response to learners’ language errors, including correction of student errors directly, objections to their errors or requiring students to improve their own language. In the 1990s, with the development of cognitive theory, researchers realized that CF and focusing on linguistic form may be helpful to promote SLA. The main research shows that teacher’s CF can give students more opportunities to pay attention to their language form (Long, 1996), so that students can notice the differences between interlanguage and target language (Schmidt, 1990), and causing students to give more responses (Swain, 1985), so as to promote the development of their interlanguage. Scholars have held different views on the effect of CF for a long time. Krashen (1985) pointed out that CF can put learners in a state of self-defense, they will focus on the language form rather than the meaning in order to avoid using complex structures, which is not conducive to language acquisition. Therefore, teachers should try to avoid correcting learner’s errors. In contrast, Schmidt & Frota (1986) argued that any learner’s language output is also the input of the whole class. If the teacher does not correct the learner’s errors in time, the student and other learners will believe that the expression is correct, and the wrong language form will be internalized.
...........
Chapter III Theoretical Rationale ............. 14
3.1 Interaction Hypo
thesis ....... 14
3.2 Noticing Hypothesis .......... 16
3.3 The Output Hypothesis ...... 17
Chapter IV Research Methodology .......... 20&nb
本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。