英语论文网

摘要：本文是一篇高中英语论文研究，本文调查结果如下：（1）研究结果表明，高中英语教师人文知识教学的现状处于中等水平。教师问卷六个维度的平均分均超过3分，但仍不超过4分，说明人文教学还有很大的提高空间。人文知识的评价方法和教学效果最低。评价方法的平均值为3.33，教学效果的平均值为3.39。这说明高中英语教师对人文知识教学的评价方法重视不够，导致教学效果不佳。

tigations are as follows：

（ 1 ） The results of the study show that the current situation of humanitiesknowledge teaching for high school English teachers is in a moderate level. The meanscores of six dimensions of the teacher’s questionnaire exceed 3 points but still do notexceed 4 points, which shows that there is much room to improve for humanisticteaching. The evaluation methods and teaching effect of humanities knowledge is thelowest. The mean of evaluation methods is 3.33, and the mean of teaching effect is3.39. This shows that high school English teachers are not pay enough attention to theevaluation methods about humanistic knowledge teaching, which leads to poorteaching effect. In addition, in terms of teaching purpose, most teachers believe thatthe teaching of humanities knowledge is to broaden students’ horizons, which showsthat English teachers can realize the importance of promoting the overall developmentof students. In terms of teaching content, most English teachers are more likely toexplain literature, religion, history, art knowledge in class, which shows that there ismore humanistic knowledge about literature, religion, history, art in textbooks and theknowledge of philosophy and law is more specialized. In terms of teaching methods,teachers use a variety of teaching methods in the teaching of humanistic knowledge,not limited to the traditional teaching method. In evaluation methods, English teachershave not yet found an appropriate method to evaluate students’ humanistic knowledgemastery. As for humanistic environment, most English teachers satisfied with it. Interms of teaching effect, the mean of it is relatively low, which is still need to beimproved.

（2）As for gender differences, male teachers are higher than female teachers infour aspects: teaching contents, teaching methods, teaching evaluation, and teachingeffects. Male and female teachers have no obvious tendency in teaching purpose andhumanistic environment.

Regarding the difference in teaching age, the teachers with more than 15 years ofteaching age do better than the teachers with less than 5 years of teaching age in theteaching of humanistic knowledge. This is because with the accumulation of teachingyears, teachers have a large number of reserves in humanistic knowledge andexperience in the teaching of humanistic knowledge was also accumulated.

reference(omitted)