Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal
英语论文题目英语教学英语论文商务英语英语论文格式商务英语翻译广告英语商务英语商务英语教学英语翻译论文英美文学英语语言学文化交流中西方文化差异英语论文范文英语论文开题报告初中英语教学英语论文文献综述英语论文参考文献
ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter
澳大利亚论文英国论文加拿大论文芬兰论文瑞典论文澳洲论文新西兰论文法国论文香港论文挪威论文美国论文泰国论文马来西亚论文台湾论文新加坡论文荷兰论文南非论文西班牙论文爱尔兰论文
小学英语教学初中英语教学英语语法高中英语教学大学英语教学听力口语英语阅读英语词汇学英语素质教育英语教育毕业英语教学法
英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查
temcet听力雅思考试托福考试GMATGRE职称英语理工卫生职称英语综合职称英语职称英语
经贸英语论文题目旅游英语论文题目大学英语论文题目中学英语论文题目小学英语论文题目英语文学论文题目英语教学论文题目英语语言学论文题目委婉语论文题目商务英语论文题目最新英语论文题目英语翻译论文题目英语跨文化论文题目
日本文学日本语言学商务日语日本历史日本经济怎样写日语论文日语论文写作格式日语教学日本社会文化日语开题报告日语论文选题
职称英语理工完形填空历年试题模拟试题补全短文概括大意词汇指导阅读理解例题习题卫生职称英语词汇指导完形填空概括大意历年试题阅读理解补全短文模拟试题例题习题综合职称英语完形填空历年试题模拟试题例题习题词汇指导阅读理解补全短文概括大意
论文作者:留学生论文论文属性:硕士毕业论文 dissertation登出时间:2024-01-30编辑:vicky点击率:458
论文字数:44524论文编号:org202401251514469391语种:英语 English地区:中国价格:$ 44
摘要:本文是一篇英语论文范文,本文从认知语言学的角度,以概念转喻理论为理论框架,对平面公益广告中的多模态转喻进行分析和论证。
Secondly, this study is expected to bring a brand new theoretical perspective to the analysis of public service advertising. At present, the research of multimodal metonymy mainly focuses on advertising and comics. In terms of advertising, researchers pay more attention to commercial advertising and less to public service advertising. PPSAs are full of multimodal metonymy. Therefore, the research on PPSAs can contribute to the expansion and development of multimodal metonymy application on the one hand and shed new light on the cognitive mechanism of public service advertising.
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Previous Studies on Conceptual Metonymy
The study of metonymy can be traced back to Aristotle’s time when metonymy was covered in metaphor theory and only regarded as a figure of speech at the linguistic level. Cicero, a rhetorician in ancient Rome, first made a special definition of metonymy. He points out that metonymy is not a direct and accurate way to say something but a rhetorical device expressed by borrowing the meaning of another thing closely related to it (Cai, 2009). From that period until the emergence of cognitive linguistics, metonymy was only regarded as a rhetorical device at the linguistic level.
Since Lakoff and Johnson point out in their book Metaphors We live by (1980) that metonymy, like metaphor, is a way of our daily thinking and a cognitive means and tool to form our conceptual system, cognitive linguists began to study metonymy as a cognitive and conceptualization tool, and gradually constructed the conceptual metonymy theory.
The research results of metonymy abroad are mainly reflected in the study of the nature of metonymy and the classification of metonymy. Foreign linguists’ understanding of the essence of metonymy is mainly from the cognitive domain (Lakoff & Turner, 1989), domain matrix (Croft, 1993), and idealized cognitive model (Radden & Kövecses, 1999). At present, the academic circles have not reached a consensus on the classification of metonymy, and the classification standards are also different. For instance, Radden & Kövecses (1999) suggest that the types of metonymy-producing relationships may be subsumed under two general conceptual configurations:(1) Whole ICM and its part(s) (2) Parts of an ICM according to the interaction between target and vehicle in the same idealized cognitive model. Panther & Thornburg (1998) divide metonymy into referential metonymy, predicative metonymy, and illocutionary metonymy from the perspective of pragmatic function. Ruiz de Mendoza (2000) classifies metonymy into source-in-target metonymy and target-in-source metonymy according to the interaction between the target domain and the source domain in metonymy. Peirsman & Geeraerts (2006) propose the classification of metonymy from the perspective of prototype theory.
2.2 Previous Studies on Multimodal Metonymy
In the 1990s, a group of scholars, represented by Forceville, extended the study of conceptual metaphor from the purely linguistic level to the pictorial level and conducted a systematic study of pictorial metaphor. Later, For本论文由英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写,英语论文代写,代写论文,代写英语论文,代写留学生论文,代写英文论文,留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。