英语论文网

s.Since the majority of error-to-cut-off intervals took place within one word isarticulated, it may come to conclusion that there is pre-articulatory monitoring. It wouldnot be possible for detection to occur after the subject has produced the error. Thus,error detection is not solely dependent on auditory comprehension. . Given that mosterror-to-cut-off intervals occurred when one words is articulated, Levelt’s MainInterruption Rule is breached to certain extent. This may be due to that the subjectconsciously delayed the interruption in order to gain time for re-planning, or themonitor is unable to detect the error or inappropriate wording in a timely manner. Themost possible condition is that the delay interruption is the result of the combined effectof both reasons.A substantial number of self-repairs had cut-off-to-repair intervals of 0s,disconfirming the possibility of re-planning happening only upon interruption. This isbecause re-planning must have been ready for articulation at the moment when theinterpretation is interrupted. This, in turn, suggests that repairs must have been plannedbefore interruption, or even during the articulation of the error or inappropriate wording.As is discussed about error-to-cut-off intervals, subject may tactically and consciouslydelay interruption until he or she were sure that re-planning was ready. Therefore, thestudy of error-to-cut-off intervals and cut-off-to-repair can find support from each other.Blacker and Mitton (1991) suggested that planning goes on incrementally during thespeech, and is stored in a buffer until it is ready for articulation. Besides, Harsulker andKolk (2001) believed that interruption and repair are triggered at the same time by errordetection. Although the present study found no evidence of the exact time for there-planning to be initiated, it would, at least, explain repairs can be ready even beforeinterruption. In this way, Interruption and re-planning go in different but parallelprocesses, which is the prior precondition of repair initiation before interruption.

5.2 Implications

Under the theoretical framework of Gile’s Effort Model, the present study studiesthe phenomenon of monitoring and self-repair in Chinese-English interpretationthrough analyzing the recordings of 20 examinees of Shanghai Advanced InterpretationAccreditation Test with some of research methods in Levelt (1991) and Pillai (2002).After being transcribed, the recordings are analyzed with the software Praat. All thecovert and overt repairs are marked, so are the duration of intervals. Then the repairs arecategorized, and the frequency and duration of each type are calculated for further dataanalysis.The first research hypothesis is that self-repairs in interpretation observes Levelt’sMain Interruption Rule. The Rule implies that speech is to be interrupted immediatelyupon error detection, even if the articulation of a word or a phrase is not finished.However, analysis of 60 repairs found in the recordings shows that most interruptiontake place after a word, a phrase or even a whole sentence is finished. Therefore thepresent study believes that interpreters do not observe the Main Interruption Rule. Thisis because the interpreters have limited attention to every process of interpretation, andthey may not be able to detect the error and inappropriateness as promptly as they do incommon speech, and this, in turn, causes the delay of interruption. On the ot本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。