英语论文网

Of all the governance criteria MCC assesses, none is as singularly important ascorruption, which, historically, has weeded out more countries for eligibility than anyother individual factor. In the process of formulating and implementing the compact,MCC and its related agencies will take measures to prevent and detect corruption.Between FY2004 and FY2019, there were 135 instances involving 34 differentcountries that potentially dropped out of eligibility purely on the basis that they failed the corruption hard hurdle, having met all other criteria (see Table 4.1). In thosecountries, 11 were from Africa (the bold fronts in Table 4.1). Kenya had the worstrecord on corruption indicator, and it had never received MCC aid. And sevencountries (Malawi, Tanzania, Benin, Niger, Zambia, Madagascar, Mozambique) hadbeen compact partners, suggesting that the MCC mechanism could contribute to theanti-corruption work.

Conclusion

Major Findings

In announcing the Millennium Challenge Account, President Bush heralded theprogram as a revolutionary new way to provide assistance to the most deserving andneediest countries and specified Africa as a region where this new type of fundingcould generate positive results. The initiative represents the largest increase in foreignaid and the most substantial realignment of the way aid is given in forty years.President Bush linked poverty and terrorism together and claimed that alleviatingpoverty would help combat terrorism. In order to increase the aid effectiveness andefficiency, a new and independent agency -- MCC -- was established to administer theMCA program.

Unlike traditional aid organizations, the MCC is designed not to deliver aid to abroad collection of impoverished nations, but rather to focus selectively on thosecountries whose governments are deemed most committed to ruling justly, investingin their people, and encouraging economic freedom -- as measured by a set ofobjective and transparent governance indicators. The design and the implementationof the program however suggest that the U.S. government may have other intentionsfor the MCA. Although most of the MCC fund has flown to African countries, theprospects for significant poverty alleviation across Africa seem remote. Similarly, theprogram’s role in the global war against terror remains debatable.

At first, the linkage between terrorism and poverty is not appropriate, not onlybecause there is no direct causal relationship between poverty reduction andinternational terrorism alleviation, but also because most of the poor people in theworld are not terrorists. Second, the selection process of MCC is definitely innovative,however, it raises a lot of questions and concerns. Foreign aid from MCC allows theUnited States to project “soft power”, and the discretionary authority owned by theMCC Board might be used arbitrarily. MCC is designed in part to lessen the influenceof the considerations on U.S. aid decisions, but there are mounting evidencessuggesting that it has become much more political. So the country selection andcooperation process must be implemented fairly and openly and strengthened overtime. Third, MCC’s action in “control corruption” has achieved some results, but wehave to see that its 本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。