英语论文网

be  demonstrated  in  section  2.5.2.2 Definition of English ditransitive construction Goldberg(1995:p.152)  gave  a  definiton  of  English  ditransitive  construction:  English ditransitive construction is strictly associated with the following arguments, agent, patient and recipient. English ditransitive construction regularly means that the agent argument conducts an  action  to  cause  the  transfer  of  an  object  to  a  recipient.  She  also  holds  that  the  typical meaning of such act is successful transfer. For example: [1] Tom gave his friend a book. It is obvious to see that the meaning of sentence [1] is that the agent Tom has implemented an action  of  giving  to  the  cause  of  the  transfer  of  the  book  to  the  recipient  his  friend.  The possession right of the books has been changed from the agent to the recipient. The action of “transfer”  is  pervasive,  for  instance,  kicking  football,  playing  badminton.  However,  most  of the transferring actions we may experience everyday are totally ignored by us. It is not strange to say that in human’s various experiences, “transfer” is the basic one.  
..........

2.2 Studies of English Ditransitive Construction
English  Ditransitive  Construction  is  a  highly-frequent  used  structure  with  its  unique semantic  and  structural  characteristics,  which  attracts  different  linguistic  schools,  such  as structuralism,  generative  grammar  and  cognitive  grammar  to  explain  and  study  it  in  detail. This  chapter  lists  the  structural  and  transformational  accounts  of  English  Ditransitive Construction.  In  general,  we  can  conclude  that  it  is  the  most  comprehensive  and  convincing from the cognitive perspective. The research object of Structural linguistics is language system itself. Structural linguists regard language as a closed system and they employ the language ontology approach. Clause is  not  only  formed  by  several  lecical  items  but  also  a  hierarchy  structure.They  believe  that language units can not be isolated with each other. Instead, they are mutually interdependent. The consequences of language units is decisively significant. For example: [13] The girl beats the dog.  In  [13],  not  all  the  five  words  have  the  same  close  relation.  In  the  eye  of  structural linguists(Fries,1952), the and girl is much closer than girl and beats. It is because that the girl constitute a noun phrase. However, girl beats is not a noun phrase. Structuralism  put  emphasis  on  the  disintegration  of  the  whole  English  ditransitive construction and the structural relationship between the two nouns. The sentence meaning is decided  本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。