英语论文网

摘要：本文是一篇商务英语论文，本文以《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法（2021修正）》的权威英译本为研究对象，以美国《联邦民事诉讼规则（2020修正）》为主要参考本，经对比研究发现其英译不当术语近30条，问题主要分为三类：（1）因误解法律含义而导致译文术语概念与原文术语概念不匹配；（2）译文用词未遵循英语国家的专业法律表达；（3）译名未遵循统一性原则。

eanings of Chinese Terms ............................... 20

4.1.2 Non-Matching of Concepts Due to Misunderstanding Legal Meanings of English Terms ....................... 22

Chapter Five Countermeasures Against These Translation Problems .......................... 32

5.1 Seeking Matching Terms by Comparing Legal Concepts in Authoritative Legal Dictionaries ......................... 32

5.1.1 Adopting Terms from Similar Laws Promulgated by English-Speaking Countries to Keep Concepts Exactly or Near Equivalent ........................ 33

5.1.2 Adopting Terms with the Closest Concepts to Chinese Terms to Keep Concepts Partially Equivalent .................................... 38

Chapter Five Countermeasures Against These Translation Problems

5.1 Seeking Matching Terms by Comparing Legal Concepts in Authoritative Legal Dictionaries

Inspired by Liu’s theoretical points on legal translation such as: a fixed legal term for a fixed legal concept, the author here puts forward the first countermeasure: seeking matching terms by comparing legal concepts in authoritative legal dictionaries. Based on Susan Šarčević’s categorization of equivalence, two sub-methods are created: (1) adopting terms from similar laws promulgated by English-speaking countries to keep concepts exactly or near equivalent, and (2) adopting terms with the closest concepts to Chinese terms to keep concepts partially equivalent. This part will illustrate how to make use of this countermeasure to find equivalent terms in detail.

In order to make it more systematic, this investigation is trying to propose a “check mode” to facilitate the process of seeking matching terms. At the very first, it is necessary for us to know the exact meaning of source terms. This step, as mentioned in chapter four, serves as the foundation of the whole translation practice. Second, authoritative legal dictionaries are utilized to check whether concepts of translated terms correspond to those of Chinese terms. If the answer is a positive one, then similar laws of English-speaking countries are employed to further check whether this translated term is really used in western legal instruments. 商务英语论文参考

Chapter Six Conclusion

6.1 Major Findings

This thesis specifically focuses on the problems of C-E translated legal terms in the authoritative English version of Civil Procedure Law. After a careful comparison with those in (US) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, these typical problems are found urgent to be solved under such three main headings as: (1) failing to match concepts of Chinese terms due to misunderstanding legal meanings, (2) failing to follow professional legal expressions in English-speaking countries, and (3) failing to follow the principle of consistency.

It is discovered that non-matching of concepts between Chinese terms and English terms is mostly caused by translators’ incapability to master legal meanings of Chinese terms, English terms, and differences between civil law system and common law system. With respect to the problem of inconsistency, considerable attention has been paid not only to the well-researched phenomenon that one Chinese legal term bears different English translations, but to the understud本论文由英语论文网提供整理，提供论文代写，英语论文代写，代写论文，代写英语论文，代写留学生论文，代写英文论文，留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。