留学生硕士论文 英国论文 日语论文 澳洲论文 Turnitin剽窃检测 英语论文发表 留学中国 欧美文学特区 论文寄售中心 论文翻译中心 我要定制

Bussiness ManagementMBAstrategyHuman ResourceMarketingHospitalityE-commerceInternational Tradingproject managementmedia managementLogisticsFinanceAccountingadvertisingLawBusiness LawEducationEconomicsBusiness Reportbusiness planresearch proposal


ResumeRecommendation LetterMotivation LetterPSapplication letterMBA essayBusiness Letteradmission letter Offer letter



英语论文开题报告英语毕业论文写作指导英语论文写作笔记handbook英语论文提纲英语论文参考文献英语论文文献综述Research Proposal代写留学论文代写留学作业代写Essay论文英语摘要英语论文任务书英语论文格式专业名词turnitin抄袭检查









论文作者:meisishow论文属性:职称论文 Scholarship Papers登出时间:2014-09-05编辑:meisishow点击率:11522

论文字数:3239论文编号:org201409050949449919语种:英语 English地区:爱尔兰价格:免费论文





Seem pretty unrelated? Sadly, they are not. Many of your electronics, like your smartphone, have micro-processing chips that require precious metals, such as gold, tin, tantalum, and tungsten. These resources have been termed ‘conflict minerals’, as they lie at the center of mineral resource exploitation and human rights violation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Therefore, your electronics and the precious metals that they require are inextricably linked to the atrocities that take place in the Congo.

The latest issue of National Geographic features heart-wrenching photos depicting the effects of mining for conflict minerals in Congo, with an accompanying article describing the relationship of the international technology trade and the continuation of violence in the DRC. The mining of conflict minerals is troublesome because it can directly fund armed groups and also engenders conflict between the government and rebel forces. The human rights violations in Eastern Congo, as a result of these conflicts, are indescribable: there have been reports of rampant sexual violence and the area has been dubbed one of the most dangerous places to be a woman. This suggests a strong link between the profitability of the mining of conflict minerals and human rights violations, a link that has to be broken.

The issue is not new; there has been previous media coverage of the movement towards conflict-free technologies. As early as 2010, Nicholas Kristof wrote a moving op-ed in the New York Times, lauding the grass-roots movements that protested for a promise for conflict-free technologies. Since 2011, the Enough Project has undertaken an initiative to score technology companies according to their efforts to trace the origin of the minerals used in their products and to proactively implement measures towards clean trade in Congo.  In 2012, Intel and HP became industry leaders on this scale; but some still lag behind, such as HTC and Nintendo who have not made any motion towards exploring clean trade.

However, how much do these scores affect the consumer’s choice? There seems to be a disconnect between such rankings and consumer awareness. In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act was signed into law. Section 1502 of the law requires that American companies audit their supply chains to ensure that the raw materials being used are conflict-free. Additionally, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) established reporting regulations for material sourcing. These regulations include yearly reports to the SEC regarding supply chains. There are several exceptions, such as companies that have no oversight on manufacturing or those that source the materials from a stable region. These ratings and the Act are effective in exposing the issue of conflict materials; however, there needs to be more public awareness.

Early evidence suggests that these measures are having an effect: there has been 论文英语论文网提供整理,提供论文代写英语论文代写代写论文代写英语论文代写留学生论文代写英文论文留学生论文代写相关核心关键词搜索。

共 1/7 页首页上一页1234567下一页尾页

英国英国 澳大利亚澳大利亚 美国美国 加拿大加拿大 新西兰新西兰 新加坡新加坡 香港香港 日本日本 韩国韩国 法国法国 德国德国 爱尔兰爱尔兰 瑞士瑞士 荷兰荷兰 俄罗斯俄罗斯 西班牙西班牙 马来西亚马来西亚 南非南非